Skip to content
Rektron

Search

    Situation in production

    The customer wants to see the requirement was met

    A complaint or an audit. Can you show what was made and how it was inspected?

    What happens

    A customer files a complaint, or a customer or auditor asks to see how a particular order was inspected.

    What should apply

    It should be possible to show what was made, how it was inspected, by whom, and what was done when something deviated.

    Why it is difficult

    • The information exists, but in different systems, binders and emails.
    • Compiling an answer takes time and ties up key people.
    • What was not recorded when it happened cannot be recreated afterwards.

    The context that is needed

    • Order and part
    • Measured values and inspection results
    • Operator and time
    • Deviations and actions
    • Gauge and calibration status

    Why do annotations make a measured value more useful?

    Illustration · Example data

    A value without context can only be compared with its limit. With operator, serial number, order, machine and cavity it can be filtered, compared and traced.

    Step by step

    • The value 12.51 is linked to operator, serial number, order, machine and cavity.
    • The cavity number makes it possible to compare cavities with each other.
    • Serial number and order make it possible to trace a single part and answer the customer.

    What does an inspection report contain, and what can it show?

    Illustration · Example data

    A report is only as good as what was recorded while the order ran. What was not saved with the value, such as order, gauge or a note, cannot be added afterwards.

    Step by step

    • During the order, measured values per characteristic, order, part and time, who measured and with which gauge, and notes on deviations are recorded.
    • The report per order is identified by customer, part, order and date, and shows per characteristic the nominal value, lower and upper tolerance limit, count, min, max and Cpk.
    • In the example the width has Cpk 1.12, below the customer's requirement of 1.33, even though every part is within tolerance.
    • The report answers the customer's question of whether the requirements were met, the auditor's question of how and by whom it was inspected, and quality's question of what to act on first.

    Same situation, different questions

    Who needs to know what

    The same event looks different depending on which decision you have to make.

    The same evidence for everyone

    • Order and part
    • Measured values and inspection results
    • Operator and time
    • Deviations and actions
    • Gauge and calibration status
    • Quality

      Asks

      "Can we show that the requirement was met for this particular order?"

      Decides

      What is sent to the customer, and whether more orders are affected.

    • Management

      Asks

      "How confident are we that we can answer the customer?"

      Decides

      Whether the way of documenting needs to change.

    • IT

      Asks

      "Where is the information, and is it connected?"

      Decides

      How the information should be stored and linked.

    What may follow

    1. 01Gather the evidence for the order
    2. 02Quarantine or recall if needed
    3. 03Answer the customer
    4. 04Close the gaps in the documentation

    Where Rektron can help

    What is available today

    In Eyesight measured values are linked to part, order and operator. Inspection reports and quality certificates can be produced from the same data.

    Do you recognise the situation?

    Tell us what it looks like where you are, and we will go through what is needed to handle it.